黑料大事记

Ecommerce鈥檚 discount code dilemma: 7 experts talk margin & mistakes

Ecommerce brands are losing margin to poorly targeted discount codes. Seven experts unpack the problem and share smarter, intent-driven alternatives that balance conversion with profitability.

Discounting is one of ecommerce鈥檚 oldest tactics. A proven lever for driving conversions, boosting AOV, and enticing new customer sign-ups. It鈥檚 a simple, effective value exchange. But it鈥檚 also safe to say many retailers often over-rely on it.

Our Intent Gap report added another statistic to support this. In a OnePoll survey of online shoppers, 83% said they use discount codes when they would have bought at full price.

83%. That鈥檚 a staggering amount of lost margin. And all without any measurable benefit.

Of course, we have our view on the problem with the status quo of discount codes. But putting aside the strategic choice of whether or not to offer promotions, it鈥檚 our stance that retailers aren鈥檛 wrong to lean on discount codes. It鈥檚 one of the few trading levers that delivers both speed and impact.

The real issue isn鈥檛 that they are being used. It鈥檚 how they鈥檙e being used.

We wanted to understand how retailers think about this. Is this just the price of doing business? Do they see a way out? To explore this, we spoke with seven ecommerce experts about how discount codes work today, what鈥檚 broken, and what they wish they could do differently.

The status quo of discount codes

鈥淢arketers congratulate themselves that their discount code campaign hit all the right KPIs when the reality is that many (all?) of those customers might just have converted without it. They鈥檝e become a drug we can鈥檛 wean ourselves off.鈥
Marty Hayes, Senior Manager, Ecommerce Specialist

For many teams, discounting feels like second nature. The campaign goes out. The numbers tick up. Everyone breathes a little easier. But Marty鈥檚 observation challenges the feel-good metrics. When discounts are applied by default, without knowing who genuinely needs them, they risk being a comfort blanket for the brand more than a value-add for the customer.

鈥淚n my experience, today鈥檚 retailers have transformed discount codes from occasional promotions into permanent fixtures.鈥
Emma Olliff, Head of Digital and eCommerce

Emma highlights the same trend through a different lens. What began as a tool to incentivise behaviour has become hardcoded into the purchase journey. If a tactic is always on, it stops being a lever. It becomes the environment. That shift affects not just performance, but perception.

鈥淲e use pre-determined discount codes to get customers across the finish line. Our codes are $50 for $1000 or more, $100 for $4500 or more, and $200 for $7500 or more.鈥
Forrest Webber, Owner

Forrest's experience shows a different side of the same issue. His discount strategy is measured, value-tied, and deliberately structured. And yet, if given the choice, he wouldn't offer them at all.聽

鈥淭o be frank, I would not offer them. But in the competitive ecommerce landscape, sometimes you have to give something up to get something in return.鈥
Forrest Webber, Owner

That tension is telling. It reflects a broader discomfort that many ecommerce leaders feel: not that discounting doesn't work, but that it often doesn't feel right.

Discounting has moved from a considered lever to a habitual tactic. And when something becomes automatic, it stops being strategic.

The cost of blanket discounting

鈥淲e鈥檝e always known there was an opportunity to improve our checkout conversion. We鈥檝e tried offering discount codes and free delivery to everyone, but it comes at a huge cost, impacting profitability too much.鈥
Jay Shufflebottom, Trading Manager

Jay calls out the trade-off directly. Discounts may move the needle on conversion, but they can quietly crush profitability in the process. For teams under pressure to hit targets, it's easy to chase uplift without accounting for margin.

It鈥檚 a pattern familiar to many. The default, sitewide offer applied in the absence of context. In contrast to the automated, habitual discounting described earlier, Jay points to a more deliberate path. One that balances cost with confidence, rather than urgency with erosion.

鈥淲e want less compromise. We want to give customers more of what they need, the experience they want, and everything that will help them make a decision. We want to give discounts to customers when they need them the most.鈥
Jay Shufflebottom, Trading Manager

Jay isn鈥檛 just asking for better targeting. He鈥檚 pointing toward a deeper rethink - one where discounts become a relevant, timely nudge instead of a catch-all incentive. It鈥檚 not about discounting less. It鈥檚 about discounting with purpose. That purpose is as commercial as it is customer-centric: fewer wasted incentives, more protected margin, and stronger relevance in the moments that matter.

The message here isn't anti-discount. It's pro-precision. Jay wants to swap broad strokes for sharper tools. That means timing, not just triggers.

鈥淚t can be tough to track whether discounts are actually boosting long-term customer value or just attracting deal-seekers.鈥
Tom Armenante, Ecommerce Director

Tom raises the performance measurement problem. Without a clear view of incrementality, teams risk giving away margin to customers who never needed the extra push. In those moments, discounting becomes a tax on conversion, not a driver of it.

The costs of blanket discounting run deeper than most metrics can show. It may lift the top line, but often erodes everything underneath.

Customers come to expect discounts

鈥淩etailers have created a dependency cycle where customers won鈥檛 buy without feeling like they鈥檝e 鈥榳on鈥 a deal. This addiction to discounting erodes brand value and trains shoppers to wait for sales rather than recognising true worth.鈥Emma Olliff, Head of Digital and eCommerce

Emma brings the brand lens. Performance isn鈥檛 just about the transaction. It鈥檚 about perception, loyalty, and price integrity. When your audience expects a deal, your full price loses credibility.

And this doesn鈥檛 just happen in-session. Ecommerce discounting has created a self-reinforcing problem. Retailers rely on always-on discounts, and in turn, shoppers have learned to search for discount codes before checking out.

鈥淚t鈥檚 become second nature once customers have added their chosen product to cart, to open up that new tab and search for 鈥榅XX discount codes鈥.鈥
Marty Hayes, Senior Manager, Ecommerce Specialist

We鈥檝e all done it. That reflex to check for a code before checking out isn鈥檛 a fringe behaviour. It鈥檚 the new norm. And it鈥檚 not just driven by price sensitivity. It鈥檚 driven by pattern recognition. Shoppers have learned the rules.

In our Intent Gap report, we also learned 85% of shoppers search for codes before buying. Yet 83% would have purchased without one.

鈥淐ustomers become conditioned to expect discounts, reducing their willingness to buy at full price.鈥
Mathew Vermilyer, Senior Director of eCommerce Analytics and Optimisation

Mathew takes it a step further. Conditioning doesn't just shape behaviour. It reshapes value. The more shoppers wait for a deal, the less urgency 鈥 and perceived worth 鈥 the product holds.

鈥淐odes are often leaked on coupon sites or found by AI chatbots.鈥
Niklas Br盲utigam, Digital CRO Manager

Niklas highlights a structural flaw. Even when brands try to be selective, discount codes are rarely contained. They escape. They get scraped, shared, reused. That leakage doesn鈥檛 just undermine margin. It breaks the intended value exchange.

Customer behaviour isn鈥檛 fixed. But it鈥檚 shaped by what they see. And right now, they鈥檙e being trained to expect discounts by default. Smarter alternatives have to break that pattern.

So, what鈥檚 the alternative?

鈥淚t would also be great to test different discount structures like tiered offers or exclusive perks to see what actually works best. Discounts are a great tool, but they need to be used strategically.鈥
Tom Armenante, Ecommerce Director

There鈥檚 no call here to abandon discounting. But Tom makes the case for rebuilding it. The answer isn鈥檛 fewer offers. It鈥檚 smarter ones. Tiered incentives, exclusives and thresholds aren鈥檛 new ideas, but they are rarely tested with rigour.

If default discounting has created dependence, it鈥檚 in retailers鈥 interests to break it. Both in the timing and the nature of the offer.

鈥淚f we could offer free delivery only to people showing hesitancy or a high likelihood of abandoning the journey, that would be a game changer.鈥Jay Shufflebottom, Trading Manager
鈥淲hat we need isn鈥檛 more codes, but smarter personalisation that rewards genuine loyalty instead of bargain-hunting behaviour.鈥
Emma Olliff, Head of Digital and eCommerce

Emma and Jay make the distinction clear. Targeting by context or real-time behaviour is better than targeting by default or simple rules. If a well-timed discount could be the difference between a sale or not, wouldn鈥檛 you want to offer it? Similarly, you may feel a loyal buyer deserves a reward, but not want to incentivise a one-time deal hunter.

鈥淥ne idea might be to display a discount if a customer is really struggling at checkout, entering expired coupons, incorrect codes, rage clicking, showing exit intent, or spending an abnormal amount of time in checkout.鈥
Mathew Vermilyer, Senior Director of eCommerce Analytics and Optimisation

Mathew suggests one of the most practical shifts: linking offers to friction. A well-timed discount isn鈥檛 just persuasive. It鈥檚 supportive. It helps the customer keep going, rather than feeling pushed.

鈥淚nstead of offering the same code to everyone, retailers should provide personalised discounts only when necessary. I wish there was more use of Multi-Armed Bandits to continuously adjust discount offers based on real-time customer behaviour for better results.鈥
Niklas Br盲utigam, Digital CRO Manager

Niklas brings in the optimisation layer. In other words, letting the algorithm run smarter tests by responding to customer behaviour, not just rules.

Personalisation doesn鈥檛 have to mean more segmentation. It can mean better responsiveness. When the system adapts based on what it sees, offers can stop being guesses.

All this hints that the future of discounting isn鈥檛 catch-all. It鈥檚 adaptive, behavioural, and already being tested by the brands getting it right.

Approaching discounts with intent

鈥淲e had one test with different variants. A showed everyone a delivery discount code, while B, C, and D only offered discount codes to those showing certain intent signals like hesitancy or abandonment.

As expected, both showed an uplift in sales, but the intent-based variants (B, C, D) delivered a much more profitable overall result with only a small difference to the top line uplift, which was a surprise.鈥
Jay Shufflebottom, Trading Manager

This is where the theory meets the real world. Jay ran the test on an alternative approach. And Intent-based discounting didn鈥檛 just work. It got more from less. The business gained almost the same conversion uplift, but with significantly more profit.

And this doesn鈥檛 just apply to discount codes. Delivery incentives, reassurance messaging and urgency prompts all become more effective when triggered by behaviour, not assumptions. Two recent plays from Buy It Direct Group bring this idea to life:

Better Bathrooms increased conversion rate by 8% by focusing on visitors who had built purchase intent but were showing signals of abandonment. Offering discounts only when behaviour signalled uncertainty.

Appliances Direct saved 42% margin (with only a minimal drop-off in orders) by only discounting visitors with high intent to purchase who were displaying clear exit signals.聽

These plays proved that relevance, not reach, is what makes a discount powerful. Intent-led discounting isn鈥檛 about doing more or less. It鈥檚 about doing what鈥檚 needed, only when it鈥檚 needed. The retailers doing this are seeing the impact where it counts.

Mathew neatly summarises the potential future of discount codes:

鈥淚deally, I would like retailers to have more dynamic and personalised discounting strategies, adjusting offers based on real-time customer intent, loyalty, and profitability.鈥
Mathew Vermilyer, Senior Director of eCommerce Analytics and Optimisation

Retailers aren鈥檛 turning their backs on discount codes though. Not yet. Even if they do see the cost of blanket offers, the risk of conditioning shoppers, and the danger of mistaking uplift for impact. Even if they are starting to call time on indiscriminate, always-on offers.

But while they are questioning how discounting is being used, they don鈥檛 see themselves completely abandoning it. Even if they want to. Instead, they want to redeem it. With smarter timing. With real relevance. With intent.

Want to protect your margin and personalise discounts at scale? Explore Discounting with Intent.


Thanks again to all the ecommerce experts who shared their thoughts with us:聽

, Senior Manager, Ecommerce Specialist

, Trading Manager at

, Ecommerce Director at

, Head of Digital & eCommerce at

, Digital CRO Manager

, Sr. Director of eCommerce Analytics and Optimization

, Owner at

Continue reading
By clicking 鈥淎肠肠别辫迟鈥 you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage and assist our marketing efforts. It's also required for live chat. View our Privacy Policy for more information.